Blackberry included. Order yours today! |
Every
once in a while I will run into issues with my work and lodge email accounts.
It happens to everyone. Most of the time it is a quick fix or I am able to step
away from the screen for a few minutes while the computer reboots. This is the simplest
solution and usually it works. However, there have been times when I have lost access
for a day or two (usually on the antiquated lodge system) which is frustrating
but there are ways to work around it as I have most of the contacts loaded into
my personal email and so I am able to maintain productivity even without direct
access. So long as I CC the main account, I don’t have any problems keeping
accurate records.
While
I can’t say for certain, this seems to be the generally accepted practice in
the business world. It might even be acceptable at government agencies but,
again, I can’t say for certain. This is what has made the recent news from the
former Secretary of State so baffling. Every person that I know in the
corporate world would have been fired for using their personal email without
backing it up to the company server/email. It is simply a matter of
accountability and maintaining an accurate record of all
communications/records. Heck, there is even an entire legal subset of
specialists focusing on e-discovery for just this reason. A former client, Evidox, comes to mind in this instance.
Maintaining
an accurate communications record is what allows a company, or in this instance
a government department, to ensure transparency. That idea sounds familiar
doesn’t it? While the President may not have noticed the odd address, hdr22@clintonemail.com,
and found out about this whole debacle “like the rest of us: through news reports this past week”
it still calls into question the bar that has been set in this administration.
And this hasn’t been the first time that the concept of transparency has been
questioned.
While it may not have solved the problem or
answered all the questions, turning over the entirety of her email archive
would have at least been a step in the right direction. After all, as was
reported in The Christian Science Monitor, “Once the controversy became known, Clinton
tweeted: “I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them.
They said they will review them for release as soon as possible.””
However, this is not going to be the case as
the records are incomplete to say the least as emails have been deleted and
physical prints provided rather than electronic copies making the search-ability
of the existing correspondences cumbersome and laborious at best. From the same
article:
The
problem is, that review could take weeks or months. Those e-mails total 55,000
pages, and as Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post wrote the other day, “Those
are the e-mails that Clintonworld decided should be turned over…. not exactly
the classic definition of transparency.”
So
now we wait to see what is there and what no longer exists in the records
provided… I’m pretty sure she deleted the limited emails from her husband (now
his would be an interesting account to look at). I guess we will never know all
the details of her workout routines, whether or not she is secret pen pals with
Monica Lewinsky, if
she really approved of her daughter’s groom, or if she originally thought that Benghazi
was a Japanese art form rather
than a giant situation best described as FUBAR. I’m pretty sure all of those
emails are long gone.
No comments:
Post a Comment