In
the wake of the mass murder at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando this past weekend I didn't want to
simply react to the tragedy but rather take the time to think and give the
space to honor the memory of those who lost their lives. This is not a partisan
issue, we should all be mourning their loss. After all those people who were
murdered were human beings and fellow citizens of this county and should not be
assigned or limited to a specific group or label. To me, right or wrong, it
really is that simple. While there have been various halfhearted comments, disgusting
accusations, and ludicrous statements made to date from a wide variety of
groups and individuals, I have found the most succinct responses to this
tragedy to be that of The
Pink Pistols and that of Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
What
we should be doing now is not placing blame on any party, person, or group of
people unrelated to the actions of the individual who committed this heinous act.
These psychotic actions and other mass murders that have become and an unfortunate
part of our collective conscious aren’t going to be cured by the rhetoric that
is currently being bandied about. We will never
truly know why these person did what they did. The fact of the matter is
that we are facing an unprecedented crisis regarding mental health in this
county.
Those
who wish to ascribe blame on these rampages on firearms are completely off base
in their assertions as the PEW
Research Center already noted that the “nation’s
overall gun death rate has declined 31% since 1993. This total includes
homicides and suicides, in addition to a smaller number of fatal police
shootings, accidental shooting deaths and those of undetermined intent.”
Additionally, nonfatal gun victimizations has dropped from 725.3 per 100,000 in
1993 to 174.8 per 100,000 in 2014. Max
Ehrenfreund at the Washington Post noted that “Much of the decline in violence is still unexplained, but
researchers have identified several reasons for the shift.” He subsequently listed
five very
plausible reasons for this decline which included more police officers on the
beat, police using computers, decreased consumption of alcohol, decreased
exposure to toxic lead, and an improved economy.
However, while overall gun
violence has experienced a precipitous drop, the FBI
has noted a marked increase in the number of active shooter incidents from
2000-2013 with the average number of incidents increasing from 6.4 from
2000-2006 to 16.4 from 2007-2013. This is in direct contrast to the decrease
in the violent crime rate reported by the FBI which noted a 27.1% decrease
in violent crime from 506.5 per 100,000 in 2000 to 369.1 per 100,000 in 2013. Consequently,
questions must be asked as to why we have such a chasm between the two stats
and why the numbers going down with regard to crimes committed with firearms
and violent crime as a whole but active shooter incidents and mass killings are
on the rise?
The truth is that firearms
know no race, gender, age, height, weight, economic status, political
viewpoint, national identity, immigration status, or sexual orientation. Firearms
are inanimate objects that require the user to impose their will. This is why, despite
the aggressive and illogical accusations of some to the contrary, the National
Rifle Association’s slogan is indeed true: “Guns don’t kill people, people kill
people.” Contrary to what many zealots may suggest, the increased frequency of
these heinous acts has nothing to do with firearms or the politics related
thereof.
The crisis that this country
faces is that of mental health which has always been a matter of public safety
since the first patient was admitted to
the Public Hospital for Persons of insane and Disordered Minds in Williamsburg, Virginia in 1773. The sad fact of the matter
is that care for the mentally ill is not a priority in this country today.
While a touch dated, the evidence is clear that the mentally ill are not
receiving the care that they need because the care simply isn’t available in
the United States.
This is in large part due to various deinstitutionalization
policies that have been wreaking havoc on the system for the past 60 years. A
staggering statistic to exemplify this point is that “in 2005 there were
17 public psychiatric beds available per 100,000 population compared to 340 per
100,000 in 1955” which translates to a 95 percent reduction in the number of the
beds in 2005 compared to 1955. For
those unfamiliar with the term, The Treatment
Advocacy Center defines it in the following way:
“Deinstitutionalization, the name given to the
policy of moving people with serious brain disorders out of large state
institutions and then permanently closing part or all of those institutions, has
been a major contributing factor to increased homelessness, incarceration and
acts of violence.”
Note the last part of that sentence. Further
proof of that point in particular can be found in our prison system as a 2004
study, as
reported in Mother Jones, suggested that “approximately 16 percent of prison and
jail inmates are seriously mentally ill, roughly 320,000 people. This year,
there are about 100,000 psychiatric beds in public and private hospitals. That
means there are more three times as many seriously mentally ill people in jails
and prisons than in hospitals.” Later in that same timeline, it is also noted
that “In the aftermath of the Great Recession [2010], states are forced to cut
$4.35 billion in public mental-health spending over the next three years, the
largest reduction in funding since deinstitutionalization.”
The further reduction in funds has had a
significant impact on the mental health system in this country which was noted
in a report from The Treatment Advocacy Center titled “No Room at the
Inn: Trends and Consequences of Closing Public Psychiatric Hospitals”.
The reality we currently face is that there was an additional reduction in the
number of beds available between 2005 and 2010 by 14 percent with the current
per capita falling to a level not seen in this country since 1850 at 14.1 beds
per 100,000 with additional decreases having been experienced since then. To
put this is further perspective, the consensus target for providing minimally adequate treatment is 50
beds per 100,000 (the ratio in England in 2005 was 63.2/100,000). This has
resulted in “states that closed more public psychiatric beds between 2005 and
2010” to experience “higher rates of violent crime generally and of aggravated
assault in particular.”
There
is plenty of blame to go around, in both political parties, across decades, as
to the insufficient mental healthcare system that we have in place today. And,
at this point, I would like to make it very clear that while the institutional
system is by no means perfect, it clearly makes a difference regarding the evil
acts that are perpetrated by the mentally unstable. And the degradation of this
system and the care available overall to the mentally ill population is
something that we need to address if we are truly motivated to change the
climate in which we live. In the end, the slaughter of innocent people was
committed by an individual who was clearly mentally ill and motivated, by self-proclaimed
during his 911 call, by a group that preys on the mentally malleable. That is
where your finger should be pointing.
No comments:
Post a Comment