On Wednesday, the Baseball Writers Association of America announced the three inductees to the Baseball Hall of Fame for 2014: Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, and Frank Thomas. All three men are well deserving of their place in the hall and I congratulate each one of them. However, this year further demonstrated the flaws that exist in the election process. With the exception of the years during the Hall’s inception, there has never been such a long list of candidates that deserve enshrinement in Cooperstown, New York. Because of the process currently in place, the misdeeds of many in the game in the past twenty years, and the idea that emotion outweighs talent in the minds of voters, there are many candidates that will either have to wait for a few years or will simply never see their bust of bronze.
The
process has become a game of finger pointing and accusation. Evidence is no
longer a factor in determining whether someone committed a crime against the
character of the game. In fact, in some instances, outstanding talent and performance
has hurt the chances of a few while steady performances year over year has
proven an obstacle for at least one candidate still on the waiting list. For
me, as someone who grew up watching man of the players now coming on the
ballot, it is a shame that I will not be able to celebrate the talent that I
spent so many years watching on the field.
I
grew up watching and playing baseball. I never really demonstrated any talent
for the game beyond a strong arm but I still enjoyed the spring and summer
games. It was also one of the few sports, and still is, that I can watch on
television that will hold my interest. This may be an oddity to some but my
mind is constantly working, pitch by pitch, play by play, whenever a game is
filling the pixels on the screen. Many of those players I watched for so many
years are, most likely, never going to stand on that stage with some of the all-time
greats of the game.
The
problem with the assumptions, accusations, and general stubbornness of the
voters is the fact that they see this tainted era as being something that is
finite. We will never be able to determine the beginning or the end of the
steroid/PED era and if you think you can you are wrong. While, undoubtedly,
performance enhancers were more prevalent during certain years but so were
greenies and cocaine during other time periods.
Heck,
no one accused Roger Maris of having an unfair advantage for smoking like a
chimney in 1961 in order to calm his nerves. In general, no one really knows if
players received any benefit from tobacco use over the years. Granted, it did
not make them bigger, stronger, or faster but maybe it helped some relax or focus.
To those who respond with the fact that most players used tobacco my response
is simple… exactly.
Players
should be evaluated for their performance on the field in competition against
their peers. Barring any illegal activity or evidence that they have broken
written rules, all players should be based on performance. Even if it seems
likely that they used something (i.e. Bonds and Clemens) we can’t exclude based
on something that wouldn’t hold up in court. And, more importantly, we can’t put
roadblocks in front of players who played in the same era where no evidence has
ever been found of any wrongdoing (i.e. Piazza, Biggio, Bagwell, Walker, and
numerous others). The BBWAA are an emotional bunch to the point that they have allowed
there disappointment of a few during an era to cloud their judgment of the
truly talented men who played the game during that time.
Something
needs to change. Objectivity needs to find its way back into the process. And,
while I don’t agree with how Deadspin went about it, the fans should have some
say, maybe just a single symbolic ballot cast for the other voters to see ahead
of time, in the process. Now that the voters have seen the ballot the fans have
cast, thank to Dan Le Batard, maybe they will finally listen. However, based on
the overreaction of the BBWAA, I seriously doubt it and it looks as though a
generation of great players, some of the greatest of all time, will languish on
the ballot finally giving way to the similarly temperamental and flawed veteran’s
committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment