There
were a couple of messages on social media that caught my attention this week
for all the wrong reasons. According to a message I received through LinkedIn, I
am uninformed because I do not accept the communist ideas as expounded by Marx.
On the other side (actually much of the same side), according to someone on
Facebook, a person whom I have personally met on numerous occasions, I am a
Nazi because I do not support socialized medicine. Essentially, they are both communistic
idealists.
First,
let’s address the LinkedIn blather. I received this in my inbox and, while I
don’t mind being picked for funds , this one is a train wreck:
“Alleanza Kontra
l-Faqar (Alliance against poverty) is a pressure group in favour of
distribution of wealth in a fairer society. We advocate and give voice to
anyone who needs our support on a number of social issues that can include
education, minimum wage, basic income for everyone and their fair economic
adjustment in view of inflation, purchasing power and cost of living,
precarious employment, third age pensioners, disabled persons, health, single
parents, the unemployed, and, social housing.
“The Alliance against Poverty is not subject to any political
or religious bias, and, its members are determined to work collectively towards
a social and overall well-being, as a basic fundamental right, in order to live
a satisfactory and decent life, whether they are living within poverty lines or
not….
“…Karl Marx - economist and sociologist ( born in 1818 ) among
others mentioned the need to have a system to take care that the work earn
enough money to have to eat , and for Marx this basic need was part of patter
that prescribed that wealth should be distributed equally amongst the members
of society.
“Unfortunately as sometimes happens even today the day , the
politicians did not implement the communism based on principles of solidarity
alone, and countries using a communist ideology such as Russia and Cuba seem to
have suppressed their notable communist policies in view of the rise of civil
wars and the intentional or non-intentional use of the inappropriate political
model to support the original philosophy that favours equality in wealth
distribution. Wealth distribution remains highly unfair towards the poorer
members of society even in modern times, with the increasing numbers of
unemployed persons during the double dip (2008).”
The
last paragraph should have read something along the lines of “Unfortunately,
as sometimes happens even to this day, politicians pander to the people and
feel the need to implement government run programs that sap the motivation and
incentive from a society. While hiding under the cover of ‘equality’ they
hinder the individuality of the people and quash any means to better themselves
in the best way that would benefit themselves, their families, and society as a
whole.” Equal distribution is not a means to utopia, it is a way to ensure
conformity. That is not a tool that should be applied to any society which
ascribes to the practice of freedom.
In
looking at the profile of this person, I am left with a great sadness for this
misguided young person. Too many of those in the younger demographic fall prey
to such doctrine. With that said, Facebook quickly reminded me that this is an epidemic
that is not just limited to ill informed youths.
Soon
after this Marxist tidbit was read, I went over to Facebook to check on a few
messages. In my stream I was confronted with the following post by someone who
shall not be named (and no it was not Tom Riddle): “Personal opinion: I believe
that the anti-Obamacare crowd is whacked beyond the Nazis. To paraphrase the
eminent historian John Lukacs, the Nazis had their half-truths. The
tea-partiers don't have diddly-squat!” Needless to say, we have a winner
for the WTF Award for the week (also a strong contender for the annual prize).
Don’t
get me wrong, I am not calling this person a communist or a socialist. Rather,
it is the vulgarity of what they see as a societal norm which brings me to draw
the comparison with the previously mentioned message. Essentially, their
message is that because I am against the a federally run healthcare system (because
we know the federal government is efficient, always on budget, and knows how to
shop around for the best deal) I am both a member of the Tea Party and a Nazi.
While at first I was shocked by this assertion, I quickly realized that it really
isn’t surprising. They are simply regurgitating the messaging that is found on
a weekly basis spewed on many of the unbiased news liberal editorial channels.
So,
because I don’t fall in line and goose step with that crowd I am the bad guy?
Frankly, I would rather have my own opinion based on my own personal
experiences and study of the subject rather than simply believing in a program
that had to be passed before anyone was told what was in it. This doesn’t mean
that all social programs are bad, some are necessary to the health and well
being of society, but some are grandiose schemes put in motion by intellectual
and societal dictators that live in their own utopian minds with little contact
here in the real world.
We
can be a self sustaining people if others would get out of the way and let us
live. If you would take the time to embrace what you have rather than focusing
on what the Jones’ have we would all be in a better place and a better state of
mind. Maybe then we could actually work on the problems of our ‘modern’ society
rather than encouraging strife and burdening this and future generations with ‘solutions’
that cause more problems than they solve.
I
know that won’t happen any time soon and maybe that makes me the idealist in
this situation. While I adamantly disagree with the fudge that is smeared on
these social media sites, it is their opinion and I believe that is a freedom
that needs to be protected even those they don’t support the freedoms that I
enjoy and feel should be protected. All I can really do is feel sorry for the
state of the people and hope that we return to a time when we can live up to
the aspirations that the founders had for this country and for us as a people.